AeroPress Premium Coffee Maker Review: Features and Trade-Offs
Affiliate disclosure: Some shopping links on this page may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This comparison is based on published specifications and identified sources, not an independently verified hands-on test.
Is the AeroPress Premium worth considering? It changes the materials and presentation of the familiar AeroPress design, using a glass chamber with metal components instead of the Original’s plastic body. It is heavier and less travel-oriented. This review compares the manufacturer’s specifications, practical trade-offs, and compatibility rather than presenting unverified hands-on test results. See the official AeroPress Premium product page for current details.
What Is the AeroPress Premium?
For a comparison of the more portable models, see our AeroPress Original versus AeroPress Go guide. The Premium is a different, glass-and-metal model. It takes Standard-size AeroPress filters according to AeroPress’s compatibility guidance, but compatibility for third-party caps varies by accessory. See our AeroPress accessory comparison for additional options.
The AeroPress Premium uses a handcrafted, double-wall borosilicate-glass chamber, an anodized-aluminum plunger and a stainless-steel filter cap. AeroPress lists a 10-US-fluid-ounce capacity and dimensions of 7 1/8 inches by 4 9/16 inches. The glass-and-metal design provides a more substantial countertop brewer than the Original, but is less suited to travel. See the official specifications for current colors, accessories and availability.
AeroPress Premium Design and Materials
Materials and care: The glass chamber is double-walled to improve heat retention, while the plunger contains aluminum and a silicone seal. The Premium is hand-wash only and should not be placed in a dishwasher or microwave. AeroPress does not recommend it for travel because glass can break. Handle the stainless-steel filter cap carefully after brewing because it can become hot. Refer to the manufacturer’s care guidance.
Brewing Method and Expected Results
Does It Taste Different from the Original?
The Premium follows the same basic AeroPress process as the Original: steep coffee grounds in water, then press gently through a filter into a sturdy mug. The supplied paper micro-filters generally produce a clean-textured cup. It does not make conventional high-pressure espresso, and roast, grind and brew ratio still determine the flavor. These are expected brewing characteristics, not results of independent hands-on testing for this article.
Does glass change the taste? Both Premium and Original use immersion and micro-filtration. The Premium’s double-wall glass is designed for better heat retention, but that does not prove the coffee will always taste smoother or less bitter. Without a controlled side-by-side test using identical beans, dose, grind and water, it is more accurate to compare their materials and convenience than to claim a flavor winner.
Ease of Use
Ease of use and cleanup: The Premium retains the familiar AeroPress chamber, plunger and filter cap. Used grounds can be ejected after brewing, but the glass-and-metal components require more careful handling and hand washing than the standard model. Check the chamber and seal for damage before use; follow the official instructions rather than assuming all AeroPress models have identical care requirements.
AeroPress Premium Pros and Cons
The following comparison highlights product attributes and trade-offs. These are specifications-based assessments, not scores from a controlled brewing or durability test.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Double-wall borosilicate-glass chamber | Higher-priced than standard AeroPress models |
| Glass-and-metal main assembly; environmental impact varies | Requires Standard-size AeroPress filters |
| Familiar AeroPress paper-filter brewing | Heavy—not travel-friendly |
| Familiar brewing routine; hand-wash only | No dishwasher or microwave use |
| Distinctive glass-and-metal countertop design | 10-ounce brewing chamber; concentrate can be diluted |
Potential Advantages
- Materials: Double-wall borosilicate glass, anodized aluminum and a stainless-steel filter cap give this model a distinctive appearance.
- Cup profile: Paper filtration can produce a clean-textured coffee, but flavor depends on the coffee and recipe rather than the Premium materials alone.
- Durability trade-off: Glass resists some scratches and temperature changes, but can break if dropped or mishandled. This is not a travel-oriented brewer.
Practical Drawbacks
- The Cost: The glass-and-metal build commands a premium over the standard model. See our Original AeroPress review to compare the features before buying.
- The Filters: The brewer uses AeroPress filters. A reusable stainless steel filter is an additional option, with separate costs depending on the seller.
AeroPress Premium vs. French Press and Pour-Over
Compared with the Bodum Chambord French press and a Hario-style pour-over dripper, the AeroPress Premium offers a different blend of immersion, paper filtration and pressing. The right option depends on how many servings you need, your preferred texture and cleanup habits.
| Feature | AeroPress Premium | Bodum Chambord | Hario V60 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brew Time | About 2 minutes for a typical recipe | 4-5 minutes | 3-4 minutes |
| Ease of Cleaning | Hand wash; eject spent grounds | Moderate (mesh cleanup) | Easy |
| Coffee Style | Paper-filtered coffee or espresso-style concentrate | Bold, full-bodied | Clean, light |
| Portability | Bulky, heavy | Not great | Lightweight |
| Aesthetic | Premium glass & metal | Classic steel & glass | Ceramic, glass or plastic drippers depending on model |
Comparison Considerations
- AeroPress Premium: The manufacturer describes improved heat retention and a premium glass-and-metal construction. It has similar brew capacity to the Original but different handling and cleanup requirements.
- Bodum Chambord: Its metal-mesh French press filter allows more oils and sediment through than AeroPress paper filters, and larger carafes suit multiple servings.
- Hario V60: A gravity-fed pour-over dripper can be lighter and more compact, though pour pattern and water flow play a greater role in preparation.
For a richer, more sediment-friendly cup and larger carafe sizes, a French press may be preferable. For control over pouring and a lighter equipment footprint, consider a V60-style dripper. The Premium mainly appeals to buyers who want AeroPress brewing in a glass-and-metal countertop design.
Who Should Consider the AeroPress Premium?
Who may appreciate it: Home coffee drinkers who prefer glass-and-metal construction, like the AeroPress workflow, and value a distinctive countertop brewer.
- Design-focused home brewers: The glass-and-metal construction is visually distinctive and intended primarily for home or office use.
- AeroPress users seeking different materials: The Premium offers the familiar brewing process with a glass chamber rather than the Original’s plastic chamber.
- Environmental priorities: Do not assume a brewer is automatically more sustainable because it uses glass and metal; manufacturing, shipping, lifespan and replacement parts also matter.
Who may prefer another brewer: Travelers, anyone prioritizing dishwasher-safe cleanup, buyers concerned about breakable glass, or people who need to make several full cups at once.
- You’re on a Budget: The premium construction costs more than a basic manual brewer, without being necessary for every coffee drinker.
- Travel needs: AeroPress specifically does not recommend the Premium for travel because the glass requires care and may break.
Final Verdict: Is the AeroPress Premium Worth It?
The Premium is a meaningful materials-and-design upgrade, not a guaranteed improvement in brewed flavor. Its 10-ounce capacity is similar to the Original, while the glass-and-metal construction adds weight and requires hand washing. If appearance, materials and heat retention are important, it is worth considering; if portability or lower cost matters most, the Original remains a practical option. See our AeroPress Original review for that comparison.
Verdict: The AeroPress Premium suits a particular preference for materials and presentation. There is no independently verified star rating or controlled taste-test result for this article, so its value is best judged by its documented specifications, maintenance requirements and current retail price. For exact details, consult the AeroPress Premium product page.
Links to check out:
